X

Human Rights After Hitler: The Lost History of Prosecuting Axis War Crimes

Product ID : 46446491


Galleon Product ID 46446491
Model
Manufacturer
Shipping Dimension Unknown Dimensions
I think this is wrong?
-
No price yet.
Price not yet available.

Pay with

About Human Rights After Hitler: The Lost History Of

Human Rights After Hitler reveals thousands of forgotten US and Allied war crimes prosecutions against Hitler and other Axis war criminals based on a popular movement for justice that stretched from Poland to the Pacific. These cases provide a great foundation for 21st-century human rights and accompany the achievements of the Nuremberg trials and postwar conventions. They include indictments of perpetrators of the Holocaust made while the death camps were still operating, which confounds the conventional wisdom that there was no official Allied response to the Holocaust at the time. This history also brings long overdue credit to the United Nations War Crimes Commission (UNWCC), which operated during and after World War II. From the 1940s until a recent lobbying effort by Plesch and colleagues, the UNWCC's files were kept out of public view in the UN archives under pressure from the US government. The book answers why the commission and its files were closed and reveals that the lost precedents set by these cases have enormous practical utility for prosecuting war crimes today. They cover US and Allied prosecutions of torture, including "water treatment", wartime sexual assault, and crimes by foot soldiers who were "just following orders". Plesch's book will fascinate anyone with an interest in the history of the Second World War as well as provide ground-breaking revelations for historians and human rights practitioners alike. The book is published by Georgetown University Press. "This important and revelatory book examines the remarkably prescient work of a UN Commission." (Geoffrey Robertson Q.C., author of Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice) "I find a lot of bravery in a book that forcefully claims...that the formation of the UN was epoch-making and a moment worthy of reexamination." (G. Daniel Cohen, Rice University)